Income taxes |
3 Months Ended | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar. 31, 2018 | ||||||||||||||
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract] | ||||||||||||||
Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block] |
Note 10 Income taxes The Company’s effective income tax rate was 17.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2018, compared to an effective tax rate of 14.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2017. For the three months ended March 31, 2018 and March 31, 2017 the Company excluded jurisdictions with losses in which no benefit can be recognized from the effective tax rate calculation. In December 2017, the President signed The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”), which includes a broad range of provisions. The TCJA contains several key provisions including:
Pursuant to the enactment of the TCJA, in the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded an adjustment of $2.9 million to revalue its net deferred tax asset utilizing the corporate tax rate of 21% which was entirely offset by a reduction in our valuation allowance. Additionally, the Company accounted for the mandatory deemed repatriation using a provisional amount of $1.9 million. Due to the complexities involved in accounting for the enactment of the TCJA, SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 allows companies to record provisional estimates of the impacts of the TCJA during a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date. In order to estimate the impact of the one-time transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings, the Company used the retained earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as a proxy to calculate E&;P for the 2017 tax provision. While retained earnings and E&;P are two separate and distinct calculations, the Company believes that retained earnings can initially be used as a relatively accurate proxy for E&;P. The Company believes that typical E&;P adjustments for items such as depreciation, certain reserves and tax exempt income and other permanent nondeductible expenses for E&;P are either immaterial or nonexistent. Therefore, in the absence of a formal E&;P analysis, retained earnings was considered to be a reasonable estimate. The Company will conduct a comprehensive E&;P analysis prior to the filing of its 2017 tax return. Only after the completion of the E&;P study will the Company be able to determine with certainty the tax impact of the deemed repatriation provision of the TCJA. Any adjustment resulting from the E&;P analysis will be included as a tax adjustment to continuing operations in 2018. As mentioned above, the TCJA subjects a U.S. shareholder to current tax on GILTI earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Staff Q&;A, Topic 740 No. 5, Accounting for Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income, states that an entity can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI resulting from those items in the year the tax is incurred. The Company has elected to recognize the resulting tax on GILTI as a period expense in the period the tax is incurred and expects to incur no tax for the year ended December 31, 2018 due to the availability of foreign tax credits and net operating losses. |